opinion


Sprint and LightSquared deal makes sense

There has been much speculation over Sprint's network strategy

This deal makes sense for both Sprint and LightSquared because they both need strategic partners to survive as the US mobile market consolidates and transitions to 4G.

Sprint needs partners to help it compete with its larger rivals in the US mobile market, particularly if AT&T’s planned acquisition of T-Mobile USA is approved. For Sprint, which just reported a net loss of $847m in the second quarter, the deal brings a welcome injection of $9bn in cash over 11 years, which will help the operator modernize its network and launch LTE. In addition, the deal gives Sprint an option to buy up to 50 per cent of LightSquared’s LTE capacity, which could help Sprint reduce the cost of its expected LTE deployment.

For LightSquared, the deal is vital and expected because its initial business plan was not viable, which the group realized as it struggled to land enough funding to build a new nationwide mobile network from scratch in a mature market such as the US. Doing a deal with an existing operator was always on the cards because it would dramatically reduce the cost and time of its deployment, by using the mobile sites and equipment of an existing operator. That was confirmed in today’s announcement that the deal with Sprint could slash LightSquared’s network deployment costs by more than $13 billion over eight years.

But the deal also brings risks. For Sprint, a strategic partnership with 4G LTE wholesaler LightSquared will complicate its existing relationship with and investment in 4G WiMAX wholesaler Clearwire. The deal also complicates – and may delay – Sprint’s transition to LTE, partly since it will now have to spend time and energy building LightSquared’s LTE network.

For LightSquared, the deal calls into question its relationship with Nokia Siemens Networks, which it tapped last year in a $7bn deal to deploy and run its nationwide LTE network. LightSquared will now pay Sprint to deploy its LTE network, and Sprint recently signed other vendors – Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent and Samsung – to overhaul its network in the runup to LTE.

Finally there is a significant risk for both Sprint and LightSquared that the deal will fall apart, if LightSquared cannot resolve concerns that its L-Band service may interfere with other services such as GPS.”


One comment

  1. Martyn Roetter 01/08/2011 @ 1:33 pm

    Good points Mike. Sprint has an exit clause in the agreement if the GPS issues cannot be resolved by end-2011. Also LightSquared has already had to revise its plan (lower transmitter power, lower L-band frequencies further away from GPS frequencies) and may never be able to use all its bandwidth. Then there is the question of whether a competitive portfolio of L-band devices will be developed given its so far unique use by Sprint/LightSquared – whereas Clearwire once/if it changes its plans and deploys LTE will at least be operating in the popular 2.5 GHz band. NSN has its own problems that will not be helped by this initiative.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Events

There are no upcoming events.

Polls

What is your name?

Loading ... Loading ...